Sunday, January 10, 2010

Qqqq Timing Better Concept Of Dollar Or Value Cost Averaging?

Better Concept of Dollar or Value Cost averaging? - qqqq timing

I saw dollar cost or average cost for a long time. I invented a better way.

Buy On average, "said Invest a fixed amount per month / period, and ultimately to a minimal level to buy more, but less in the highs.

Average costs for investments, "said fixed amount per month / term sell on the increase in value, do not invest if the corresponding increase in the proportion of next month., Your purchases of stop-Reduce-DONT buy this leads to more -- if you down, if the sale of high

I invested Rydex Venture-Speed Concept Fund (these 2 are the exact opposite / 2 Tim negatively correlated (twice) to QQQQ

Every month or period of risk for falls Rydex Investments Rydex next month, when the value of a higher risk, then a value is an average cost for the speed .. This concept is not offered financial accounting. But someone who agrees? To the test? propblem all hidden in this concept? I want someone to share my ideas and thoughts.

1 comment:

muncie birder said...

I assume you mean the Rydex Dynamic S & P 500 Master Fund and the Rydex Inverse Dynamic S & P 500 fund. The first is connected with 200% increase in the S & P 500 and the 2 is 200% correlated with the decrease of the S & P-500. I am not at all familiar with an investment fund or funds Rydex Rydex speed.

One of the problems I see are spending money. They are very important. 1.7% minimum. The other thing I see is the leverage. He is working against you and for you. In a bear market can lose a substantial portion of its investment in the average. Return after 1929. If his average to use a fund, started in October 1929, which were completely destroyed in 1933. The same thing happened in 1972.

Also, I do not think where he would face next to a bull.

Leverage can be a murderer, while the market goes against you. And with an average it will really kill.

Post a Comment